RT @Timothy_Edgar: I spent years overseeing NSA & other agencies. We delude ourselves if we think it is tyrant-proof or Trump-proof.https://t.co/j4C7Ai1aFj
RT @caleb_crain: As the NSA, CIA, & FBI are transferred to Trump, keep in mind what he did when he had a hotel telephone switchboard: https://t.co/Tt8lg25djv
RT @Snowden: To defend NSA from critics, @WashingtonPost attacks the story they broke. Which won the Pulitzer for Public Service. https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/777525911453392897
RT @JimBovard: Wash Post celebrates Constitution Day with an editorial condemning Snowden & denying NSA ravages privacy @ggreenwald https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/edward-snowden-doesnt-deserve-a-pardon/2016/09/17/ec04d448-7c2e-11e6-ac8e-cf8e0dd91dc7_story.html?utm_term=.e0488625f168
RT @rj_gallagher: In case you were wondering what actual NSA intercepts from Gmail & Facebook looked like: https://theintercept.com/2016/08/14/nsa-gcsb-prism-surveillance-fullman-fiji/ https://t.co/Jdd2icIH7B
RT @Anthony: First person in the world publicly identified as a confirmed NSA PRISM target. https://theintercept.com/2016/08/14/nsa-gcsb-prism-surveillance-fullman-fiji/
RT @ggreenwald: Also showed that NSA/DNI purposely deceived the public on this. Great work @JasonLeopold, @emptywheel & VICE team. https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/739165179603226624
RT @Snowden: Wow: New documents prove I raised Constitutional concerns within the #NSA. For years, the @WhiteHouse denied this. https://news.vice.com/article/edward-snowden-leaks-tried-to-tell-nsa-about-surveillance-concerns-exclusive
RT @glynmoody: an interesting question is: do the NSA or GCHQ have access to it...? #panamapapers https://twitter.com/mathewi/status/717095567084552192
RT @csoghoian: Starting in 90s, NSA used underwater drones, delivered by submarine, to tap undersea cables. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesmatkinson https://t.co/ASfgshBEuX
RT @marzullij: Actual footnote in FBI affidavit: "Based on my training and experience, the colon followed by a close parenthesis represents a smiley face."
RT @ggreenwald: True. Most of Silicon Valley were full-scale NSA collaborators before. Now eager to show pro-privacy bona fides. https://twitter.com/xeni/status/704763648753795072
RT @trevortimm: More than anything it sounds like many of the Judiciary committee members are pissed that the FBI circumvented Congress & went to the courts
RT @Snowden: A federal judge just shot the @FBI's war on internet security through the heart. Simply devastating. #AppleVsFBI https://twitter.com/the_intercept/status/704461811945500673
RT @FromCarl: Apple vs. FBI brings more Q's, including can gov't use yr fingerprint to unlock devices? @webbmedia for @CNNOpinion http://cnn.it/1RqKcAx
RT @trevortimm: So the FBI's claim they were only after one iPhone in the San Bernardino case lasted...less than 24 hours. https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/701983871378837504
RT @ggreenwald: Great, clear explainer from @kashhill on all the relevant factors in Apple v. FBI http://fusion.net/story/271636/apples-battle-with-the-fbi/
RT @MarcusWohlsen: If Apple wants to make the government seem relatable and sympathetic, blaming it for not understanding iCloud is definitely the way to go
RT @dannyyadron: I've been writing about the feud between Apple & FBI since 2014. The latest filling from DOJ is unquestionably the low point in this fight.
RT @ggreenwald: Good background from @sarahjeong on the obscure 1789 statute the FBI is invoking to try to force Apple to decrypt https://motherboard.vice.com/read/writs-and-giggles
RT @JohnPaczkowski: Apple: Terrorist’s Apple ID Passcode Changed In Government Custody, Blocking Access http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnpaczkowski/apple-terrorists-appleid-passcode-changed-in-government-cust?utm_term=.ht0rr9mM1 https://t.co/tlq0acH9NA
RT @bradheath: #DOJ says it isn't forcing Apple to *give* the FBI an iPhone hack. It "never has to come into the govt's custody." https://t.co/WNssuAPl8a
RT @dabeard: US: @Apple refusal to unlock phone to FBI a 'marketing decision.' Others say it would establish precedent in China http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/20/business/justice-department-calls-apples-refusal-to-unlock-iphone-a-marketing-strategy.html?emc=edit_na_20160219&nlid=46001823&ref=cta&_r=0
RT @jilliancyork: Why Apple is right to challenge an order from the FBI (@NYTimes editorial board): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/19/opinion/why-apple-is-right-to-challenge-an-order-to-help-the-fbi.html
RT @eric_analytics: Supreme Court: government "cannot compel a manufacturer to write new code"How Apple Will Fight US Demand for Access https://apple.news/A11udimz1NaGNuVeTDpa1iw
RT @eastdakota: Interesting Third Amendment argument in FBI v. Apple case: forcing company to write faulty code is modern equivalent of quartering soldiers.
