RT @Snowden: Skeptical? I once believed NSA wouldn't ignore constitutional complaints. Then I heard this: (CC: @Thomas_Drake1)https://amp.twimg.com/v/ea9f6a77-6950-466d-a469-4b326002fdc6
RT @ggreenwald: Also showed that NSA/DNI purposely deceived the public on this. Great work @JasonLeopold, @emptywheel & VICE team. https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/739165179603226624
RT @Snowden: Wow: New documents prove I raised Constitutional concerns within the #NSA. For years, the @WhiteHouse denied this. https://news.vice.com/article/edward-snowden-leaks-tried-to-tell-nsa-about-surveillance-concerns-exclusive
RT @glynmoody: an interesting question is: do the NSA or GCHQ have access to it...? #panamapapers https://twitter.com/mathewi/status/717095567084552192
RT @csoghoian: Starting in 90s, NSA used underwater drones, delivered by submarine, to tap undersea cables. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesmatkinson https://t.co/ASfgshBEuX
RT @ExtremeTech: The NSA wanted Hillary Clinton to use this crazy secured Windows CE phone http://www.extremetech.com/mobile/225058-the-nsa-wanted-hillary-clinton-to-use-this-crazy-secured-windows-ce-phone https://t.co/1CS3Fb75xb
RT @csoghoian: Clinton started using her email server a month after NSA refused her a secure Blackberry. http://bigstory.ap.org/260d4ff55af34d969a2e27ae8d8f1c7b https://t.co/Tw5TDAZS4L
RT @csoghoian: Clinton started using her email server a month after NSA refused her a secure Blackberry. http://bigstory.ap.org/260d4ff55af34d969a2e27ae8d8f1c7b https://t.co/Tw5TDAZS4L
RT @TimothyS: How universities collaborate with NSA on surveillance - er, Science of Security. Let's count the ways. @Cryptomeorg https://cryptome.org/2016/03/nsa-sos.jpg
RT @counternotions: Tale of two companies: Apple fights FBI on encryption, Amazon nukes encryption from its tablets.https://twitter.com/davidscovetta/status/705311217737314304
RT @marzullij: Actual footnote in FBI affidavit: "Based on my training and experience, the colon followed by a close parenthesis represents a smiley face."
RT @ggreenwald: True. Most of Silicon Valley were full-scale NSA collaborators before. Now eager to show pro-privacy bona fides. https://twitter.com/xeni/status/704763648753795072
RT @JZdziarski: Several hackers in the jailbreak community have told me they’d craft an exploit, FBI was not interested in talking to me or them about it.
RT @trevortimm: More than anything it sounds like many of the Judiciary committee members are pissed that the FBI circumvented Congress & went to the courts
RT @Snowden: A federal judge just shot the @FBI's war on internet security through the heart. Simply devastating. #AppleVsFBI https://twitter.com/the_intercept/status/704461811945500673
RT @alexeheath: tfw when the FBI asks you to hack the iPhone http://www.techinsider.io/apple-shares-argument-for-not-hacking-san-bernardino-iphone-2016-2 https://t.co/bzZJq8uMs4
RT @jcstearns: USA Today journalist @StevenPetrow got hacked on a public in-flight wifi network while writing an Apple-FBI story http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/2016/02/24/got-hacked-my-mac-while-writing-story/80844720/
RT @WristlyResearch: Apple - FBI - the fight is on. Our Wristly panel shares some insights. https://medium.com/@bdesarnauts/the-fight-for-privacy-9248755aadc3#.v20mqjz48
RT @FromCarl: Apple vs. FBI brings more Q's, including can gov't use yr fingerprint to unlock devices? @webbmedia for @CNNOpinion http://cnn.it/1RqKcAx
RT @ampressman: "if the FBI...can get into your computers without your consent, so can cybercriminals. So can the Chinese. So can terrorists." @schneierblog
RT @_decius_: Why I disagree with nearly everyone regarding Apple and the FBI: https://medium.com/@_decius_/why-i-disagree-with-nearly-everyone-regarding-apple-and-the-fbi-58f4ace4352b#.1gwdlrgp9
RT @mims: Gates did not back FBI against Apple but good job aggregating that misinformation, everyone http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-02-23/gates-disputes-report-that-he-backs-fbi-in-apple-dispute
RT @stratechery: Apple, the FBI, and Securityhttps://stratechery.com/2016/apple-the-fbi-and-security/Apple v FBI is framed as privacy v security. But the security argument favors Apple
RT @trevortimm: So the FBI's claim they were only after one iPhone in the San Bernardino case lasted...less than 24 hours. https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/701983871378837504
RT @ncardozo: Remember when FBI & NYPD were urging us to use full disk encryption to protect our security? https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160221/21583733665/remember-when-fbi-nypd-told-people-to-upgrade-their-iphones-to-enable-stronger-security.shtml https://t.co/GFi6ihItOz
RT @ggreenwald: Great, clear explainer from @kashhill on all the relevant factors in Apple v. FBI http://fusion.net/story/271636/apples-battle-with-the-fbi/
RT @_ChrisHarris: FBI vs Apple iPhone encryption story is not a ‘marketing stunt’, but it’s killed competitor announcements at Mobile World Congress anyway.
RT @thegrugq: ICYMI: The FBI is scaring people into being worried about weird implausible theories of terrorism. https://medium.com/@thegrugq/feeble-noise-pollution-627acb5931a2
RT @mlevchin: FBI Director Comey goes on the record about FBI’s intent re Apple. https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-director-comments-on-san-bernardino-matter
RT @dangillmor: According to these authoritarians, Apple is not permitted to believe in civil liberties if the govt says not to. https://www.lawfareblog.com/apple-selling-you-phone-not-civil-liberties
