Amazon said it was "working on" a brief supporting Apple in San Bernardino. We'll see if that crosses today https://twitter.com/davidscovetta/status/705311217737314304
RT @counternotions: Tale of two companies: Apple fights FBI on encryption, Amazon nukes encryption from its tablets.https://twitter.com/davidscovetta/status/705311217737314304
RT @jcstearns: USA Today journalist @StevenPetrow got hacked on a public in-flight wifi network while writing an Apple-FBI story http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/2016/02/24/got-hacked-my-mac-while-writing-story/80844720/
This post over polls on the FBI v. Apple case show why consumer sentiment research is hard and so many are bad at it.http://fortune.com/2016/02/23/apple-fbi-poll-pew/
RT @WristlyResearch: Apple - FBI - the fight is on. Our Wristly panel shares some insights. https://medium.com/@bdesarnauts/the-fight-for-privacy-9248755aadc3#.v20mqjz48
By me @stratechery:Apple, the FBI, and Securityhttps://stratechery.com/2016/apple-the-fbi-and-security/Apple's position is not just pro privacy but also pro security
RT @_decius_: Why I disagree with nearly everyone regarding Apple and the FBI: https://medium.com/@_decius_/why-i-disagree-with-nearly-everyone-regarding-apple-and-the-fbi-58f4ace4352b#.1gwdlrgp9
RT @mims: Gates did not back FBI against Apple but good job aggregating that misinformation, everyone http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-02-23/gates-disputes-report-that-he-backs-fbi-in-apple-dispute
RT @stratechery: Apple, the FBI, and Securityhttps://stratechery.com/2016/apple-the-fbi-and-security/Apple v FBI is framed as privacy v security. But the security argument favors Apple
RT @ggreenwald: Great, clear explainer from @kashhill on all the relevant factors in Apple v. FBI http://fusion.net/story/271636/apples-battle-with-the-fbi/
RT @mlevchin: FBI Director Comey goes on the record about FBI’s intent re Apple. https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/fbi-director-comments-on-san-bernardino-matter
RT @dangillmor: According to these authoritarians, Apple is not permitted to believe in civil liberties if the govt says not to. https://www.lawfareblog.com/apple-selling-you-phone-not-civil-liberties
Turns out someone changed an Apple ID that might have allowed the phone to back up data to iCloud—which would have given the government a chance to seize ...
RT @ggreenwald: Good background from @sarahjeong on the obscure 1789 statute the FBI is invoking to try to force Apple to decrypt https://motherboard.vice.com/read/writs-and-giggles
“Despite its efforts, Apple nonetheless retains the technical ability to comply with the Order, and so should be required to obey it," the Justice Department ...
RT @jilliancyork: Why Apple is right to challenge an order from the FBI (@NYTimes editorial board): http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/19/opinion/why-apple-is-right-to-challenge-an-order-to-help-the-fbi.html
RT @eric_analytics: Supreme Court: government "cannot compel a manufacturer to write new code"How Apple Will Fight US Demand for Access https://apple.news/A11udimz1NaGNuVeTDpa1iw
RT @alansmurray: Here's what the Apple-FBI fight is about: The legal issues at stake in the FBI vs. Apple case via @FortuneMagazine http://for.tn/1QJp5qa?xid=for_tw_sh
Apple CEO Tim Cook takes on the FBI for threatening your data http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/apple-ceo-tim-cook-takes-on-the-fbi-over-data_us_56c4772fe4b08ffac1271288 @dlberes on @HuffPostTech #BigData